Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Gregor Berkowitz's avatar

Thank you for highlighting this issue.

The FCC ban is a sledgehammer non-fix to a significantly challenging technical issue - connected devices are designed to leak (broadcast) data.

The FCC ban fails to address the challenges that exist from complete products all the way through the component supply chain to BLE/WIFI modules, 5G/LTE modems, and China-developed SW BSP packages.

EU and other countries have been working to address these issues with data privacy and connected device security regulations for the past couple of years.

Fundamentally, the depth of these challenges is difficult for most tech companies to understand and even more difficult to address.

Chuks's avatar

This is a great framing, Sunil. “You only control a machine you can turn off and survive” is the line that sticks.

I’d extend it one layer further as robots become increasingly autonomous. Control won’t just be about who made the magnets, actuators or batteries. It’ll also be about whether we can independently verify who authorized the machine, what it’s allowed to do, and whether that authority can be revoked without depending on whoever built or operates it.

The trust boundary isn’t the chassis. It’s the entire dependency graph, hardware, software and authority.

Ps: I really loved that scene from The Matrix --also saw it for the first time in college.

No posts

Ready for more?